Tax them or let them fight it out amongst themselves
Environmental or Carbon taxes are never popular as people cannot see CO2, nor the environment, a bit like the wood for the trees on this one, and no tax is ever popular anyhow. So, governments shy away from this type where they can. Britain in the rich world has been particularly shy, reducing its percentage of tax income from environmental taxes by 1.68% 1996-20071. This has been despite a labour (new) government who sings the environment song fairly often these days.
The best the new budget of the year could do was to talk about plastic/carrier bags and how they must be reduced, and the government might want to tax them. This is somewhat lame, but even if they did come down and put a proper tax on this, the government must ring fence such a tax for use in tackling climate change. It cannot simply add it to a pool of tax it collects, and then spend it on say a war or nuclear power stations (esp. when it ignored its own white paper on renewable energy).
Most people will not care about this when (if) they vote in the next election, as the downturn in the economy will be far hotter a topic then. But, climate change is not going to go away and is far more serious. People need to think about these matters and demand the right course of action from governments.
In fact, it is down to people to also request it from the private sector. If consumers exercise their choice and pay their hard-earned cash only for green products and think about their use of energy and contribution to climate change, we would be in a different world.
1The Economist - 8th March 2008 – Hot air
Add a comment